ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Beyond breast abscess and malignancy: a case of bilateral idiopathic granulomatous mastitis.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is a rare, benign, chronic inflammatory breast disease. It often mimics breast cancer or abscess, complicating diagnosis. Accurate identification is essential for guiding therapy, particularly in regions with high prevalence of infectious diseases such as tuberculosis. Case presentation: A 33-year-old female presented with a 1.5-year history of bilateral painful breast masses, erythema, and sinus tract formation. Imaging demonstrated multiple hypoechoic collections and ductal alterations. Initial management targeting presumed breast abscess with antibiotics and surgical drainage provided only transient relief. Core (true-cut) biopsy revealed epithelioid granulomas with multinucleated giant cells and no neoplastic changes. Infectious causes, including tuberculosis, were excluded via negative Mantoux, sputum examination, and Ziehl-Neelsen tests. Sarcoidosis was ruled out by normal serum angiotensin-converting enzyme, absence of systemic features, and lobulocentric granulomas with mixed inflammatory cells, distinguishing IGM from the well-formed "naked" granulomas seen in sarcoidosis. Clinical discussion: Despite negative Mantoux and Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining, empirical antitubercular therapy was initiated due to the paucibacillary nature of tuberculous mastitis and the high likelihood of false-negative results in our TB-endemic region. Subsequent biopsy confirmed IGM. The patient responded excellently to tapered oral corticosteroids combined with methotrexate. This case highlights the diagnostic complexity and the importance of histopathological confirmation to distinguish IGM from infections and other granulomatous diseases. Conclusion: Bilateral IGM is a therapeutic and diagnostic challenge due to its mimicry of malignancy and infection. Histopathology is critical for accurate diagnosis, and immunosuppressive therapy with corticosteroids and methotrexate can provide effective management, particularly in resource-limited health care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.