ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Advancements in rhinoplasty: Exploring smart artificial cartilage implants for enhanced tissue regeneration and minimized rejection.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhinoplasty often requires cartilage grafts to restore nasal contour and function. Traditional options, such as autologous, allogeneic, and synthetic materials, remain limited by donor-site morbidity, restricted availability, and long-term complications, including resorption and extrusion. Advances in tissue engineering and biomaterial science have led to the development of smart artificial cartilage implants that combine mechanical strength with biologic responsiveness. These materials can adapt to external stimuli, such as mechanical load, temperature, or electrical signals, promoting better integration and durability. Hydrogels, piezoelectric composites, and nanohybrid scaffolds have shown enhanced chondrogenic potential and mechanical compatibility in preclinical studies. Furthermore, three-dimensional bioprinting and stem-cell-based strategies enable the fabrication of patient-specific constructs that reduce intraoperative manipulation and improve anatomical fit. Although early experimental and limited clinical results are promising, current evidence remains heterogeneous and largely confined to small case series. Broader clinical validation, standardized testing protocols, and clear regulatory frameworks are needed to ensure safe and reproducible translation. Smart artificial cartilage implants thus represent a significant step toward next-generation rhinoplasty materials, merging functional durability with biologic adaptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.