Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675782›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

Effectiveness of thiazide diuretics in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Taimoor Ashraf, Fnu Chandni, Fnu Nancy, Nisha Devi, Deepa Bai, Ramsha Waseem, Maheen Jabbar, Muskan Turesh, Shah Dev, Rabia Bint I Zafar and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Taimoor AshrafDepartment of Medicine, Nishtar Medical University, Multan, Pakistan.
Fnu ChandniDepartment of Medicine, Isra University, Hyderabad, Pakistan.
Fnu NancyDepartment of Medicine, United Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Nisha DeviDepartment of Medicine, Bahria University of Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Deepa BaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Peoples University of Medical and Health Sciences, Benazirabad, Pakistan.
Ramsha WaseemDepartment of Medicine, Institute Shaheed Mohtarma Medical College Lyari, Karachi, Pakistan.
Maheen JabbarDepartment of Medicine, Bahria University Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muskan TureshDepartment of Medicine, Ghulam Muhammad Mahar Medical College, Sukkur, Pakistan.
Shah DevDepartment of Medicine, Ghulam Muhammad Mahar Medical College, Sukkur, Pakistan.
Rabia Bint I ZafarNishtar Medical University, Multan, Pakistan.
Sadia MananDepartment of Medicine, Ziauddin Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Fatima JabbarDepartment of Medicine, Bahria University Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Iqra MaryamDepartment of Medicine, Jinnah Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zara NaveedDepartment of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sayed JawadDepartment of Medicine, Kabul Medical University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Thiazide diuretics are commonly prescribed for the treatment of hypertension (HTN). However, the comparative efficacy and safety of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) versus chlorthalidone (CTD) in managing patients with HTN remain unclear. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using two electronic databases, MEDLINE and Cochrane, from their inception through November 2024. The aim was to identify randomized controlled trials or observational double-arm studies assessing the effects of HCTZ versus CTD on cardiovascular outcomes and safety in patients with HTN. Outcomes were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and analyses were conducted using a random effects model. A Results: Of the 409 articles identified in the initial search, six relevant studies were included in the final analysis. No significant differences were observed between the HCTZ and CTD arms for cardiovascular outcomes, including major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and angina. However, patients receiving CTD experienced significantly higher rates of hypokalemia and hyponatremia compared to those on HCTZ. The risk of acute kidney injury did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion: HCTZ and CTD showed comparable efficacy in terms of cardiovascular outcomes. Nevertheless, HCTZ appeared to have a safer profile, with a lower incidence of electrolyte imbalances, such as hypokalemia and hyponatremia, compared to CTD.

Indexed as

chlorthalidonehydrochlorothiazidehypertensionthiazide diuretics

Identifiers

PMID41675782
PMCPMC12889342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.