ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Sticky bone in regenerative dentistry: a paradigm shift in graft stability or a promising technique still under scrutiny?
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sticky bone is an emerging regenerative material in dentistry that combines autologous injectable platelet-rich fibrin with particulate bone grafts to form a cohesive, moldable, and biologically active mass. It addresses limitations of conventional bone grafting by integrating biologic and mechanical benefits into a single material, enhancing the predictability of dental regenerative procedures. Its clinical advantages include adaptability to defect sites, reduced graft migration, and sustained release of growth factors to accelerate healing. Objectives: This review evaluates the applications, efficacy, and limitations of sticky bone in implantology and periodontics, focusing on its role in ridge augmentation, socket preservation, sinus lifts, and management of periodontal defects. It also synthesizes evidence on its biologic mechanisms, handling properties, and clinical outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science) to identify studies on sticky bone's composition, clinical techniques, and outcomes. Keywords such as sticky bone, Injectable PRF, Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix, Concentrated Growth Factors, and bone graft were employed in the search. Results: Evidence from the reviewed literature indicates that sticky bone significantly improves graft stability and handling properties, preventing particle migration and scattering. Its fibrin scaffold supports sustained release of growth factors, which enhances angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and osteogenesis. Clinically, it has been successfully applied in horizontal ridge augmentation, sinus lift procedures (even with small membrane perforations), socket preservation, and the repair of periodontal and alveolar cleft defects, demonstrating enhanced bone density, superior soft tissue healing, and reduced postoperative discomfort. Conclusions: Sticky bone offers a biologically enriched, easy-to-handle grafting material that enhances healing and graft stability in dental procedures. Its fibrin scaffold supports tissue integration and vascularization, while particulate grafts provide osteoconductive frameworks. Current evidence underscores its value in modern regenerative dentistry, though further long-term studies are needed to standardize protocols and optimize outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.