ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Rectus sheath hematoma masquerading as acute pancreatitis: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and Importance: Rectus sheath hematoma (RSH) is an uncommon and frequently misdiagnosed cause of acute abdominal pain that may mimic more serious intra-abdominal emergencies, including acute pancreatitis. Case Presentation: We present the case of a 62-year-old man who developed a large RSH following a coughing episode, presenting with right-sided abdominal pain and periumbilical ecchymosis (Cullen's sign). Normal pancreatic enzymes and computed tomography (CT) imaging were key in excluding pancreatitis and confirming the diagnosis of RSH. The patient was managed conservatively with a successful resolution. Clinical Discussion: This case highlights the importance of considering RSH in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen, even in the absence of anticoagulation, and the critical role of imaging in its timely diagnosis. This case reinforces the value of CT imaging and focused physical examination in differentiating RSH from other causes of acute abdomen. Conclusion: RSH remains a rare but critical diagnostic consideration in patients presenting with acute abdominal pain, particularly when Cullen's or Grey Turner's signs are present but pancreatic enzymes are normal. Early diagnosis, facilitated by CT imaging, can prevent unnecessary surgical interventions and guide successful conservative management, thereby improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.