ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in maxillofacial reconstruction surgery: a narrative review.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mandibular and craniofacial reconstruction following ablative surgery due to trauma, tumor resection, or congenital deformities presents a complex challenge requiring a balance of functional restoration and aesthetic outcomes. Historically, various autografts and alloplastic materials have been employed for these reconstructive procedures. However, the advent of computer-assisted design and manufacturing technologies has ushered in a new era, enabling the precise creation of patient-specific implants from advanced biomaterials such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK). This narrative review aims to explore the evolving role of PEEK in maxillofacial reconstruction surgery, detailing its intrinsic properties, diverse applications across the craniofacial skeleton, and the advantages it offers over traditional materials like titanium and bone grafts. We will delve into the current challenges and limitations associated with PEEK, including its bio-inertness, and discuss promising future directions and innovative strategies focused on enhancing its bioactivity and expanding its clinical utility. The integration of virtual surgical planning, 3D printing of complex PEEK structures, and surface modification techniques highlights the potential for improved surgical accuracy, reduced operative times, and enhanced patient-specific outcomes in maxillofacial reconstruction. This review synthesizes current literature to provide a comprehensive understanding of PEEK's present status and future trajectory in this dynamic surgical specialty.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.