Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675694›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2026

EC-Bench: a benchmark for enzyme commission number prediction.

Saeedeh Davoudi, Christopher S Henry, Christopher S Miller, Farnoush Banaei-Kashani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saeedeh DavoudiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, 80204, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5653-0823
Christopher S HenryArgonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 60439, United States.
Christopher S MillerDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, 80204, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9448-8144
Farnoush Banaei-KashaniDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, 80204, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4102-9873

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Enzymes are proteins that catalyze specific biochemical reactions in cells. Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers are used to annotate enzymes in a four-level hierarchy that classifies enzymes based on the specific chemical reactions they catalyze. Accurate EC number prediction is essential for understanding enzyme functions. Despite the availability of numerous methods for predicting EC numbers from protein sequences, there is no unified framework for evaluating and studying such methods systematically. This gap limits the ability of the community to identify the most effective approaches for enzyme annotation. Results: We introduce EC-Bench, a benchmark for EC number prediction, consisting of (i) an initial representative set of existing methods (including homology-based, deep learning, contrastive learning, and language model methods), (ii) existing and novel accuracy and efficiency performance metrics, and (iii) selected datasets to allow for comprehensive comparative study. EC-Bench is open-source and provides a framework for researchers to not only compare among existing methods objectively under uniform conditions, but also to introduce and effectively evaluate performance of new methods in a comparative framework. To demonstrate the utility of EC-Bench, we perform extensive experimentation to compare the existing EC number prediction methods and establish their advantages and disadvantages in a variety of prediction tasks, namely "exact EC number prediction," "EC number completion," and (partial or additional) "EC number recommendation." We find wide variation in the performance of different methods, but also subtle but potentially useful differences in the performance of different methods across tasks and for different parts of the EC hierarchy. Availability and implementation: The benchmarking pipeline is available at https://github.com/dsaeedeh/EC-Bench.

Identifiers

PMID41675694
PMCPMC12889163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.