Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675661›Full record

ReviewQuantitative biology (Beijing, China)2023

Computational methods for identifying enhancer-promoter interactions.

Haiyan Gong, Zhengyuan Chen, Yuxin Tang, Minghong Li, Sichen Zhang, Xiaotong Zhang, Yang Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. EPIFBMC: A New Model for Enhancer-Promoter Interaction Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haiyan GongSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Materials Genome Engineering University of Science and Technology Beijing Beijing 100083 China.
Zhengyuan ChenSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Materials Genome Engineering University of Science and Technology Beijing Beijing 100083 China.
Yuxin TangSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Materials Genome Engineering University of Science and Technology Beijing Beijing 100083 China.
Minghong LiSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Materials Genome Engineering University of Science and Technology Beijing Beijing 100083 China.
Sichen ZhangSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Materials Genome Engineering University of Science and Technology Beijing Beijing 100083 China.
Xiaotong ZhangSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Materials Genome Engineering University of Science and Technology Beijing Beijing 100083 China.
Yang ChenState Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Institute of Basic Medical Sciences School of Basic Medicine Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100005 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As parts of the cis-regulatory mechanism of the human genome, interactions between distal enhancers and proximal promoters play a crucial role. Enhancers, promoters, and enhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs) can be detected using many sequencing technologies and computation models. However, a systematic review that summarizes these EPI identification methods and that can help researchers apply and optimize them is still needed. Results: In this review, we first emphasize the role of EPIs in regulating gene expression and describe a generic framework for predicting enhancer-promoter interaction. Next, we review prediction methods for enhancers, promoters, loops, and enhancer-promoter interactions using different data features that have emerged since 2010, and we summarize the websites available for obtaining enhancers, promoters, and enhancer-promoter interaction datasets. Finally, we review the application of the methods for identifying EPIs in diseases such as cancer. Conclusions: The advance of computer technology has allowed traditional machine learning, and deep learning methods to be used to predict enhancer, promoter, and EPIs from genetic, genomic, and epigenomic features. In the past decade, models based on deep learning, especially transfer learning, have been proposed for directly predicting enhancer-promoter interactions from DNA sequences, and these models can reduce the parameter training time required of bioinformatics researchers. We believe this review can provide detailed research frameworks for researchers who are beginning to study enhancers, promoters, and their interactions.

Indexed as

deep learningenhancerenhancer‐promoter interactionmachine learningpromoter

Identifiers

PMID41675661
PMCPMC12807187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.