ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Hemodynamic effects of volume expansion on left ventricular-arterial interactions in circulatory shock-a prospective observational study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Left ventricular-arterial interaction, also termed ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC), determines cardiovascular efficiency by matching cardiac performance and arterial functions, and comprehensively assesses cardiac contractility and arterial load in a common framework. Volume expansion is a commonly used hemodynamic measure in the management of circulatory shock. However, its hemodynamic effects on each component of the cardiovascular system are not fully understood. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of volume expansion on the left VAC and determine whether the left VAC is associated with fluid responsiveness in circulatory shock. Materials and methods: This prospective observational study enrolled mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory shock, for whom the attending physician decided to perform a fluid challenge. Hemodynamics and left VAC were measured immediately before and after the fluid challenge. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a 15% or greater increase in cardiac index following the fluid challenge. Left VAC was quantified by the ratio of arterial elastance (Ea) to left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees), measured by echocardiography. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify hemodynamic variables associated with fluid responsiveness. Results: Of 58 enrolled patients, 26 (44.8%) were fluid responders. Fluid responders exhibited a higher baseline Ea/Ees ratio compared to non-responders (1.22 ± 0.28 vs. 1.02 ± 0.30, Conclusion: In mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory shock, volume expansion optimized the left VAC in preload-dependent patients, primarily by reducing arterial load, and the baseline left VAC was associated with fluid responsiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.