ArticleBioMed research international2026
Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Bloodstream Pathogens in Feni, Bangladesh.
Article in BioMed research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Bloodstream Pathogens in Feni, Bangladesh.BioMed research international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bloodstream infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality, increasingly exacerbated by antimicrobial resistance. We investigated the prevalence and resistance profiles of bloodstream pathogens in Feni, Bangladesh. Methods: Between October 2024 and March 2025, we conducted a 6-month cross-sectional study at a diagnostic center in Feni, Bangladesh. Blood cultures from 498 patients with suspected bloodstream infections were analyzed, and bacterial isolates were identified and tested for antibiotic susceptibility using standard methods. Results: Among 498 blood samples, 49 (9.84%) yielded positive bacterial growth. Infections were most common in patients aged over 49 years (36.7%), with near-equal distribution between males (51.0%) and females (49.0%). Gram-negative bacteria predominated (73.5%), including Conclusion: This study reveals the predominance of gram-negative bloodstream infections and extensive
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.