ArticleJPRAS open2026
Optimization of the Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System for the storage of peripheral nerve allografts.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral nerve reconstruction for large-gap injuries remains limited by the shortcomings of autografts and decellularized allografts, which rarely achieve full recovery and carry donor site morbidity. This study investigated whether the Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System (MOPS) could be optimized for peripheral nerve allograft preservation by supplementing it with methylcobalamin (MOPS-N-B12) or glial-derived neurotrophic factor (MOPS-N-GDNF). Fifty rat sciatic nerves were harvested, stored in one of three solutions (MOPS, MOPS-N-B12, MOPS-N-GDNF), and analyzed after 30, 60, or 90 days. Outcomes included compound action potentials (CAPs), Schwann cell viable cell density (VCD), and histopathology. CAPs were evoked in all grafts at 30 days, and in all MOPS-N-B12 and MOPS-N-GDNF grafts at 60 days, compared to only 60% of MOPS grafts. At 90 days, 80% of MOPS-N-B12 and MOPS-N-GDNF grafts retained CAPs, vs. 40% for MOPS. VCD was maintained across groups at 30 days, but MOPS-N-B12 showed significantly higher VCD at 60 and 90 days. Notably, grafts with VCD <100 cells/mm² failed to evoke CAPs. Histopathology severity scores increased over time for all groups, though MOPS-N-B12 consistently had lower scores at 60 and 90 days, reflecting reduced Schwann cell death, axonal degeneration, and myelin disruption. These findings suggest that MOPS-N-B12 provides superior preservation of Schwann cell viability, myelin integrity, and electrical conduction compared to standard MOPS or MOPS-N-GDNF. Importantly, viable nerve allografts were maintained for up to 90 days at room temperature, supporting the feasibility of shelf-stable, off-the-shelf viable nerve allografts for clinical use in peripheral nerve reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.