ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
NeuroSwift: computer vision-based system to assess the cognitive-motor speed of soccer players-preliminary findings.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cognitive-motor speed (CMS) in soccer integrates perceptual-cognitive processing with motor execution, yet many tools lack this integration and have limited ecological validity. NeuroSwift was engineered as a computer vision-based automated analysis platform to standardize tactical stimuli and produce reproducible measurements. Methods: A 3 × 3 interaction surface, front-facing visual stimuli, and HD video were orchestrated by a web application. Twenty-nine players (15 professionals, 14 university athletes) completed 16 scenarios (8 offensive, 8 defensive). Visuomotor reaction speed (VMRS), displacement speed (DS), and response capacity (RC) were obtained, and cognitive-motor speed (CMS = VMRS + DS, in seconds) was computed. Normality and homogeneity were verified using Shapiro-Wilk and Levene's tests. VMRS and DS were compared using independent-samples Results: Professionals showed faster VMRS (0.77 ± 0.12 vs. 0.96 ± 0.12 s; Conclusion: NeuroSwift enabled standardized stimuli, automated footstep detection, and reproducible
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.