Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675510›Full record

ReviewQuantitative biology (Beijing, China)2025

A comparison of integration methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data and ATAC sequencing data.

Yulong Kan, Weihao Wang, Yunjing Qi, Zhongxiao Zhang, Xikeng Liang, Shuilin Jin

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yulong KanSchool of Mathematics Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9200-5161
Weihao WangSchool of Mathematics Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin China.
Yunjing QiSchool of Mathematics Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin China.
Zhongxiao ZhangSchool of Mathematics Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin China.
Xikeng LiangSchool of Mathematics Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin China.
Shuilin JinSchool of Mathematics Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell genomics give us a new perspective to understand multivariate phenotypic and genetic effects at the cellular level. Recently, technologies have started measuring different modalities of individual cells, such as transcriptomes, epigenomes, metabolomes, and spatial profiling. However, integrating the results of multimodal single-cell data to identify cell-to-cell correspondences remains a challenging task. Our viewpoint emphasizes the importance of data integration at a biologically relevant level of granularity. Furthermore, it is crucial to take into account the inherent discrepancies between different modalities in order to achieve a balance between biological discovery and noise removal. In this article, we give a systematic review for the most popular single-cell integration methods and models involving cell label transfer, data visualization, and clustering task for downstream analysis. We further evaluate more than 10 popular integration methods on paired and unpaired gold standard datasets. Moreover, we discuss the data preferences of the limitations, applications, challenges and future directions of these methods.

Indexed as

clustering analysissingle‐cell integrationsingle‐cell omics

Identifiers

PMID41675510
PMCPMC12806117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.