Comparison of inpatient charges and costs between revision and primary total elbow arthroplasty in the New York state.

Background: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate differences in inpatient charges between primary (pTEA) and revision (rTEA) total elbow arthroplasty among Medicare and Medicaid patients. Our secondary aim is to assess whether these charges vary across hospitals with differing total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) procedural volumes. We hypothesize that rTEA would be more expensive than pTEA and that charges would be higher for low-volume hospitals. Methods: The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried for all Medicare and Medicaid Services patients who underwent a pTEA or rTEA in New York State from 2010 to 2020. Hospitals were classified as high-volume (≥3 surgeries/year), medium-volume (between 2-3 surgeries/year), or low-volume (less than 2 surgeries/year). Facilities performing fewer than 1 surgery per year or with fewer than 4 years of TEA data were excluded. Total inpatient charges were collected and subsequently subdivided into ancillary and accommodation charges. Inpatient charges and readmission data were compared across the 2 procedures and volume groups. Results: During the study period, 1,303 patients underwent pTEA and 273 underwent rTEA. After adjusting for patient age, sex, race, and hospital volume, rTEA was independently associated with significantly higher accommodation, ancillary, and total inpatient charges ( Conclusion: rTEA is associated with longer inpatient stay, higher inpatient charges, and greater readmission rates compared to pTEA. Primary TEA in low-volume hospitals is associated with higher total charges compared to medium and high-volume hospitals. These findings provide valuable insights for hospital administrators and public health officials aiming to create effective strategies to manage costs and combat the growing burden of healthcare expenses in the United States.