ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Profiling of bushmeat value chain actors in the northern sector of Ghana for targeted interventions to reduce zoonotic disease and public health risks.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The bushmeat trade in Northern Ghana is important for rural economies and food security, but it faces challenges like poor hygiene, the risk of zoonotic diseases, and the fact that it is not sustainable. There is insufficient information regarding the principal actors, their socio-economic functions, and adherence to hygiene and food safety standards. Methods: A mixed-methods design was employed to gather data from 61 purposely selected participants involved in the bushmeat value chain in Ghana's Upper East and Upper West regions. The methods used to collect data included structured questionnaires, focus group discussions with hunters, traders, consumers, and wildlife officers, direct observations, and participatory techniques to find out how food is distributed and how safe it is to eat. Results: The study found that all the hunters were men between the ages of 25 and 50, with a majority lacking formal education (59.5%), who worked part-time mostly during the dry season and earned low monthly incomes, with over half making less than GHs100. Most of the hunters and traders had not been taught how to keep food safe. Almost all of the meat (97.3%) was processed in the bush using traditional smoking and then sold in dirty places. Seventy percent of trade was in smoked meat, and 58.8% of that was moved in baskets or bags. Hunters had low pay, a 95% drop in wildlife, and prices in the market that traders set. Conclusion: Northern Ghana's bushmeat trade is a multifaceted social, economic, and public health issue that requires targeted interventions to enhance sanitation, develop new revenue streams, and more effectively implement laws protecting wildlife. To effectively deal with these problems, all stakeholders, including local communities, government agencies, and NGOs, need to work together to find a sustainable balance between protecting biodiversity, public health, and the economic wellbeing of rural people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.