ReviewFrontiers in radiology2025
Radiologic imaging and its current importance in breast cancer management.
Review in Frontiers in radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic impact of extensive nodal involvement in small-sized (T1) breast cancer: a population-based and propensity score-matched analysis of the SEER database.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Quantitative Evaluation of Pectoral Muscle Visualisation as an Indicator of Positioning Quality in Screening Mammography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study examines the approaches used for cancer screening in women, insisting on the roles of mammography, breast ultrasound, breast MRI, computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography. Mammography is still the key method for early detection, with modern digital technology boosting image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Breast MRI provides increased sensitivity for high-risk individuals, and it is recommended to be used with mammography for full screening. Methods: This review article provides a comprehensive assessment of breast imaging techniques, focussing on screening recommendations and advancements in mammography, ultrasonography, MRI, CT, and PET. These methods provide a multidisciplinary approach to improving breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and personalized care. Early detection is necessary for less aggressive treatment. Digital breast tomosynthesis consists of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, molecular breast imaging, MRI, and USG. Results: Mammography remains the primary imaging modality for detecting breast abnormalities, including cancer. The use of standardized interpretation systems improves the communication of findings. The present paper summarizes the primary disputes surrounding breast cancer management. Conclusion: According to the literature, low-dose mammography is the only radiographic technique that has significantly impacted the diagnosis, staging, and patient follow-up for asymptomatic breast cancer screening. Mammography is also the only accurate screening test for breast imaging. Implications for practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.