Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675396›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Learning as a shield against death: a 10-day daily diary study examining mortality salience and academic engagement among college students.

Yaqin Yan, Qing Xie, Ji Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yaqin YanDepartment of Student Affairs, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha, China.
Qing XieDepartment of Management, Hunan Police Academy, Changsha, China.
Ji LaiDepartment of Management, Hunan Police Academy, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Academic engagement is a critical determinant of success and wellbeing for college students. While previous research has identified the influence of stable environmental and individual factors, it has largely overlooked the impact of dynamic, daily psychological experiences. Moreover, mortality salience can be triggered by common experiences such as pandemics or accidents, yet its link to academic engagement remains unexplored. Grounded in Terror Management Theory (TMT) and Compensatory Control Model (CCM), this study employed a 10-day daily diary study with 102 Chinese undergraduates to investigate how daily mortality salience influences academic engagement. Results from a multilevel path analysis revealed significant, though modest, positive indirect associations between daily mortality salience and academic engagement both through death anxiety and personal control. These findings demonstrate that academic engagement can serve as a compensatory mechanism to manage existential threat. This study not only bridges a theoretical gap by integrating TMT and CCM but also provides practical insights, suggesting that educators can enhance engagement by fostering a sense of meaning and personal control in the learning environment.

Indexed as

academic engagementcompensatory control modeldaily diary studydeath anxietymortality saliencepersonal controlterror management theory

Identifiers

PMID41675396
PMCPMC12886371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.