Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675382›Full record

ArticleBurns & trauma2026

Virtual reality as a pain reduction method in burn and wound healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marina Moreno-Martínez, Artur Dalfó-Pibernat, Josep Vidal-Alaball

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Burns & trauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marina Moreno-MartínezUnitat de Recerca i Innovació, Gerència d'Atenció Primària i a la Comunitat de la Catalunya Central, Institut Català de la Salut, Soler i March, 6, (08242) Manresa, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5316-8451
Artur Dalfó-PibernatCentre d'Atenció Primària Horta, Gerència Territorial de Barcelona ciutat, Institut Català de la Salut, Lisboa s/n, Horta-Guinardó, (08032) Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2539-3715
Josep Vidal-AlaballUnitat de Recerca i Innovació, Gerència d'Atenció Primària i a la Comunitat de la Catalunya Central, Institut Català de la Salut, Soler i March, 6, (08242) Manresa, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3527-4242

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Burns and wounds cause significant physical and psychological distress, with pain being a major barrier to recovery. Traditional pharmacological methods for pain management carry risks such as side effects and dependency. Virtual reality has emerged as a non-invasive, distraction-based technique that may reduce pain perception during wound care by modulating sensory input. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251005004), assessed the effectiveness of virtual reality in managing pain during wound and burn care. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted in March 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing virtual reality interventions to standard care or other distraction techniques in patients with active wounds or burns. Data on pain outcomes, as well as physiological indicators, were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model and Hedges' g as the effect size estimator. The analysis was performed with SPSS version 29 and the risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool. Results: Eleven studies (n = 936 participants) were included, with diverse wound types (burns, surgical, limb injuries) and virtual reality setups, predominantly immersive. The overall pooled effect showed a statistically significant reduction in pain using virtual reality (g = -1.528; 95% CI: -2.259 to -0.797; p < 0.001), indicating a moderate-to-large effect. Subgroup analysis revealed that virtual reality was most effective in children (g = -2.348), followed by adolescents (g = -0.538), while adults showed a non-significant effect (g = -1.453). High heterogeneity (I Conclusions: Virtual reality appears to be a promising tool for reducing procedural pain, particularly in children with wounds or burns. Its efficacy in adolescents is moderate, while evidence in adults remains inconclusive. Given its non-pharmacological nature and potential to improve patient experience, virtual reality warrants broader implementation and further age-specific research in wound care settings.

Indexed as

BurnsMeta-analysisPainVirtual realityWounds

Identifiers

PMID41675382
PMCPMC12888808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.