ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Metastatic Marjolin Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Single-center Experience.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Malignancy in Chronic Leg Wounds: Diagnostic Delay and Clinical Implications in a Tertiary Wound-Care Cohort.International wound journal · 2026Observational
- Malignant Transformation and Progression of Musculoskeletal Lesions with Imaging-Pathology Correlation-Part 2: Soft Tissue Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Marjolin ulcers (MUs) are rare, aggressive cutaneous malignancies that arise from previously injured or chronically inflamed skin. MUs have a poorer prognosis than other types of skin malignancies, with higher nodal metastases and recurrence rates. Although surgical resection remains the primary treatment modality, the management and outcomes of patients with metastatic disease are not well characterized. We reviewed literature on treatment strategies for metastatic MUs and report our institutional experience so as to stimulate interest in this difficult-to-treat entity. Methods: A systematic review on metastatic MUs following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed using the English-language literature. An institutional case series is reported to capture the experience of a rural African hospital. Results: Of 180 publications reviewed, 9 studies with 129 patients, with a mean age of 50.3 years, were included in the study. Burn scars were the most common precursor (54%), with squamous cell carcinoma accounting for 97% of cases. Metastases involved the regional lymph nodes, lungs, and liver. Initial treatment included wide local excision or amputation, with or without adjuvant radiotherapy. Survival data were sparse. Our institutional cohort of 11 patients showed similar patterns of metastases. Conclusions: This review did not identify any effective treatment for metastatic MUs. The current management strategies are largely determined by institutional resource settings, but remain essentially palliative in their approach, highlighting the need for a standardized approach to achieve optimal patient outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.