ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Experience Using the Funnel Insertion Method Lubricated With Hyaluronic Acid for Breast Implantation.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Keller Funnel facilitates breast implant placement while minimizing contamination and capsular contracture risk. Antiseptic agents are commonly used as lubricants, but they may carry adverse effects. This study evaluated outcomes of funnel-assisted insertion lubricated with hyaluronic acid compared with manual insertion. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 200 patients undergoing primary breast augmentation (2022-2024). Data were collected from the records of 100 patients who received manual implant insertion and 100 patients who underwent implant placement using the funnel technique. Demographics, surgical variables, scar size, insertion time, complications, and patient satisfaction (BODY-Q) were analyzed. Statistical significance was set at a Results: Mean patient age was 25.3 years, body mass index was 21.8 kg/m Conclusions: Funnel insertion with hyaluronic acid reduced scar size, insertion time, and complication risk compared with manual insertion, while achieving high and comparable satisfaction. This technique offers a safe "no-touch" alternative that may lower contamination and capsular contracture risk. Prospective studies are needed to validate long-term efficacy and to compare hyaluronic acid with antiseptic additives.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.