Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675349›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

A Spatiotemporal Perspective on Dynamical Computation in Neural Information Processing Systems.

T Anderson Keller, Lyle Muller, Terrence J Sejnowski, Max Welling

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T Anderson KellerThe Kempner Institute for the Study of Natural and Artificial Intelligence at Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Lyle MullerWestern University, Department of Mathematics, London, Ontario, Canada.
Terrence J SejnowskiSalk Institute for Biological Studies, Computational Neurobiology Laboratory, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Max WellingUniversity of Amsterdam, Institute for Informatics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Traveling Waves in Neocortical Circuits: Mechanisms, Computational Roles in Sensory Processing, and Impact on Sensory PerceptionU01NS131914 · NINDS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI COLEMAN, TODD P, KUZUM, DUYGU · 2023 to 2025
$6.0M
Spatiotemporal patterns of neural activity and their role in perceptionR01EY028723 · NEI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI Lyle Edward Muller, JOHN H REYNOLDS · 2018 to 2026
$3.7M
DDALAB: Identifying Latent States from Neural Recordings with Nonlinear Causal AnalysisRF1MH132664 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SEJNOWSKI, TERRENCE J · 2023 to 2023
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028723NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH132664NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS131914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatiotemporal flows of neural activity, such as traveling waves, have been observed throughout the brain since the earliest recordings; yet there is still little consensus on their functional role. Recent experiments and models have linked traveling waves to visual and physical motion, but these observations have been difficult to reconcile with standard accounts of topographically organized selectivity and feedforward receptive fields. Here, we introduce a theoretical framework that formalizes and generalizes the connection between 'motion' and flowing neural dynamics in the language of equivariant neural network theory. We consider 'motion' not only in physical or visual spaces, but also in more abstract representational spaces, and we argue that recurrent traveling-wave-like dynamics are not just useful but necessary for accurate and stable processing of any signal undergoing such motion. Formally, we show that for any non-trivial recurrent neural network to process a sequence undergoing a flow transformation (such as visual motion) in a structured equivariant manner, its hidden state dynamics must actively realize a homomorphic representation of the same flow through recurrent connectivity. In this "spatiotemporal perspective on dynamical computation", traveling waves and related flows are best understood as faithful dynamic representations of stimulus flows; and consequently the natural inclination of biological systems towards such dynamics may be viewed as an innate inductive bias towards efficiency and generalization in the spatiotemporally-structured dynamical world they inhabit.

Identifiers

PMID41675349
PMCPMC12889856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.