Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675332›Full record

ArticleTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2026

Endoscopic ultrasound trends of solid pancreatic lesions in Gulf Cooperation Council countries.

Sarah S Al Ghamdi, Jenan Ghaith, Ali Alali, Narges Ali, Khaled Bamakhrama, Shamma Binjerais, Mohammad S Albeshir, Dimah Alaskar, Amer AlKhatib, Aydamir Alrakawi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Sarah S Al Ghamdi *Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7461-0501
Jenan Ghaith *Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Ali AlaliKuwait University Hospital, Kuwait, Kuwait.
Narges AliKuwait University Hospital, Kuwait, Kuwait.
Khaled BamakhramaRashid Hospital, Dubai, UAE.
Shamma BinjeraisRashid Hospital, Dubai, UAE.
Mohammad S AlbeshirGastroenterology Section, Department of Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Dimah AlaskarGastroenterology Section, Department of Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Amer AlKhatibCleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Aydamir AlrakawiCleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Somieya KhanRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland-Medical University of Bahrain, Busaiteen, Bahrain.
Ibrahim BalubaidDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
AlMotasembillah Abdulaziz RammalCollege of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Majed M AlmaghrabiCollege of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal BatwaCollege of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah Salem AlfawazCollege of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Saleh DumyatiCollege of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Eyad GadourMulti-Organ Transplant Centre of Excellence, Liver Transplantation Unit, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic cancer and other solid pancreatic lesions present significant diagnostic challenges owing to their deep anatomical location and nonspecific symptoms. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as a critical modality for high-resolution imaging and tissue sampling of pancreatic lesions. However, comprehensive data on its utilization and findings in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries remain scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the demographic characteristics, clinical presentations, and diagnostic outcomes of solid pancreatic lesions assessed via EUS in GCC countries. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive analysis was conducted on 551 patients who underwent EUS for the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions between 2020 and 2024 across multiple healthcare institutions in the GCC countries. Demographic data, clinical symptoms, imaging findings, and diagnostic outcomes were also collected. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Chi-squared tests for categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney U tests for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Results: A total of 551 patients (mean age 61.5±13.7 years; n=330 males, 59.9%) were included. Most were symptomatic (n=499, 90.6%), with abdominal pain (n=354, 64.2%) being the most common symptom. Computed tomography was the initial diagnostic modality in the majority (n=469, 85.1%). Lesions were most frequently located in the pancreatic head/uncinate on imaging (n=329, 59.7%) and EUS (n=361, 65.6%). Vascular involvement was observed in 260 (47.2%) radiologically and 226 (41.1%) on EUS. Lesion size was smaller on EUS (34 Conclusions: EUS plays a pivotal role in diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions in the GCC countries, offering safe and effective lesion characterization and tissue sampling. Standardized protocols and further molecular research are warranted to enhance diagnostic precision and outcomes in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

diagnostic imagingEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS)fine-needle aspiration (FNA)Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)solid pancreatic lesions

Identifiers

PMID41675332
PMCPMC12887279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.