ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Radiomics based on habitat analysis in predicting parametrial invasion of early stage cervical cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate radiomics based on habitat analysis for preoperatively predicting parametrial invasion (PMI) in clinically early-stage cervical cancer (CC). Methods: This retrospective study included 110 consecutive patients clinically staged as IB-IIA before treatment. Patients were randomly divided into the training and testing cohorts in an 8:2 ratio. Regions of interest were manually delineated on T2-weighted images, which were then segmented into sub-regions using a k-means clustering algorithm based on voxel intensity and entropy values. Radiomic features were then extracted from both the whole tumor and each sub-region. Feature selection was performed using correlation analysis, recursive feature elimination, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method. Subsequently, models were constructed based on valid radiomics features extracted from the whole tumor and from each sub-region. The diagnostic accuracy of the models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) was compared descriptively, and the analysis was supplemented by net reclassification improvement and comprehensive discrimination improvement measures. Results: Tumors were divided into three sub-regions (habitat 1-3). A total of 2260 and 1890 radiomics features were extracted from whole tumor and each habitat, respectively. After selection, 10, 10, 7 and 9 valid features were selected from whole tumor and habitats 1-3, respectively. All models had good classification performance for positive and negative PMI in the training and testing cohorts, with an AUC ranging from 0.777 to 1.00 in the training cohort and from 0.750 to 0.850 in the testing cohort. In addition, the diagnostic performance of habitat 3 was higher than that of the whole tumor, habitat 1, habitat 2 models in the training and testing cohorts, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC (95% confidence interval) of habitat 3 model in the training and testing cohorts were 97.9%, 100%, 1.00 (0.999-1.00) and 75.0%, 100%, 0.850 (0.649-1.00), respectively. Conclusion: Radiomics based on habitat analysis effectively predicts PMI in early-stage CC, with diagnostic performance superior to that of traditional whole-tumor radiomics. This approach provides a promising method for preoperative prediction of PMI in CC and aids clinicians and patients in treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.