ArticleAI in neuroscience2025
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Derived Kinematic Deviation Index for the Evaluation of Forelimb in Rodents.
Article in AI in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D motion capture data into a kinematic composite score for assessing musculoskeletal impairments.Journal of biomechanics · 2025Article
- Conditioning Electrical Nerve Stimulation Enhances Functional Rewiring in a Mouse Model of Nerve Transfer to Treat Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Rodent models are widely used to study neurological conditions and assess forelimb movement to measure functional performance, deficit, recovery, and treatment effectiveness. Traditional assessment methods based on endpoints such as whether the task is successfully accomplished, while easy to implement, provide limited information on movement patterns critical for assessing different functional strategies. On the other side, detailed kinematic analysis provides granular information on the movement patterns but is difficult to compare across laboratories and may not translate to clinical metrics of upper limb function. Methods: To address these limitations, we developed and validated a machine learning derived kinematic deviation index (KDI) for rodents that mimics current trends in clinical neurological research. The KDI is a unitless summary score that quantifies the difference between an animal movement during a task and its optimal performance derived from spatiotemporal marker sequences without pre-specifying movements. Results: We demonstrate the utility of KDI in assessing reaching and grasping in mice and validate its discrimination between trial endpoints in healthy animals. Furthermore, we show KDI sensitivity to interventions disrupting neurological function, including acute and chronic spinal cord injury and optogenetic disruption of sensorimotor circuits. Conclusion: The KDI provides a comprehensive measure of motor function that bridges the gap between detailed kinematic analysis and simple success/failure metrics, offering a valuable tool for assessing recovery and compensation in rodent models of neurological disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.