Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675258›Full record

ArticleAI in neuroscience2025

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Derived Kinematic Deviation Index for the Evaluation of Forelimb in Rodents.

Abel Torres-Espin, Amanda Bernstein, Marwa Soliman, Juan Sebastián Jara, Yunuen Moreno-López, Edmund Hollis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AI in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abel Torres-EspinSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Amanda BernsteinBurke Neurological Institute, White Plains, NY, USA.
Marwa SolimanBurke Neurological Institute, White Plains, NY, USA.
Juan Sebastián JaraBurke Neurological Institute, White Plains, NY, USA.
Yunuen Moreno-LópezBurke Neurological Institute, White Plains, NY, USA.
Edmund HollisBurke Neurological Institute, White Plains, NY, USA.

Funding

Modulation of cortical networks, a new approach to spinal cord injury rehabilitationDP2NS106663 · NINDS · WINIFRED MASTERSON BURKE MED RES INST · PI HOLLIS, EDMUND R · 2017 to 2020
$2.8M
Optical Dissection of Intracortical Circuits Supporting Motor Recovery After Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS105725 · NINDS · WINIFRED MASTERSON BURKE MED RES INST · PI HOLLIS, EDMUND R · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS106663NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rodent models are widely used to study neurological conditions and assess forelimb movement to measure functional performance, deficit, recovery, and treatment effectiveness. Traditional assessment methods based on endpoints such as whether the task is successfully accomplished, while easy to implement, provide limited information on movement patterns critical for assessing different functional strategies. On the other side, detailed kinematic analysis provides granular information on the movement patterns but is difficult to compare across laboratories and may not translate to clinical metrics of upper limb function. Methods: To address these limitations, we developed and validated a machine learning derived kinematic deviation index (KDI) for rodents that mimics current trends in clinical neurological research. The KDI is a unitless summary score that quantifies the difference between an animal movement during a task and its optimal performance derived from spatiotemporal marker sequences without pre-specifying movements. Results: We demonstrate the utility of KDI in assessing reaching and grasping in mice and validate its discrimination between trial endpoints in healthy animals. Furthermore, we show KDI sensitivity to interventions disrupting neurological function, including acute and chronic spinal cord injury and optogenetic disruption of sensorimotor circuits. Conclusion: The KDI provides a comprehensive measure of motor function that bridges the gap between detailed kinematic analysis and simple success/failure metrics, offering a valuable tool for assessing recovery and compensation in rodent models of neurological disorders.

Indexed as

deviation indexforelimb functionfunctional assessmentkinematicsmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41675258
PMCPMC12889874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.