ArticleKidney medicine2026
Multinational Real-World Practice Patterns in the Use of Antithrombotic Therapy Among Patients on Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Patients with kidney failure requiring maintenance dialysis have a high risk of cardiovascular events warranting antithrombotic therapies, including oral anticoagulant (OAC) or antiplatelet therapy (APT). However, chronic use of antithrombotic therapy can increase the bleeding risk in patients receiving dialysis. However, little is known about medication use patterns and risk of bleeding events in real-world clinical practice. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of data from 2 prospective cohort studies. Setting & Participants: We included 27,612 patients from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) and 5,289 patients from the Peritoneal DOPPS (PDOPPS), international cohorts of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Exposures: Patient demographics and comorbid conditions; OAC and APT use. Outcomes: OAC and APT use; a bleeding composite outcome including a hospitalization or death because of a major bleeding event. Analytical Approach: Descriptive analyses to explore OAC and APT utilization and crude rates of the bleeding composite outcome and Kaplan-Meier analyses to estimate medication discontinuation. Results: Baseline OAC and APT use was 9% and 10% in HD patients and 4% and 7% in PD patients, respectively. Patients prescribed antithrombotic drugs were older and more likely to have a history of cardiovascular disease. After 36 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimated proportions of baseline users who remained on therapy were 57% for OAC and 53% for APT. The composite bleeding rates per 100 patient-years among patients with baseline OAC use versus baseline APT use versus neither were 8.6, 5.6, and 4.1 in HD patients and 12.0, 6.1, and 3.9 in PD patients, respectively. Limitations: Potential for event misclassification; no over-the-counter medication data; rates unadjusted. Conclusions: Antithrombotic drugs are infrequently prescribed and often discontinued in patients receiving HD or PD. With major bleeding event rates high among antithrombotic users, new strategies are needed to optimize the risks and benefits of antithrombotic agents in the dialysis setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.