ArticleKidney medicine2026
Determining Physical Function Measures for Estimating VO
Article in Kidney medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response to the Letter Regarding "Determining Physical Function Measures for Estimating VOKidney medicine · 2026Article
- Regarding "Determining Physical Function Measures for Estimating VOKidney medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing is the gold standard for evaluating cardiovascular functional capacity, as assessed by oxygen uptake at peak exercise (VO Study Design: Cross-sectional analysis from the "Effects of Long Interdialytic Intervals on Cardiovascular Functional Capacity (ECON)" study. Setting & Participants: Thirty patients with kidney failure receiving maintenance thrice-weekly hemodialysis. Predictors: Physical function tests. Outcomes: VO Analytical Approach: Group comparisons for demographics and physical function measures were performed. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess associations. Results: The Low and High groups were well matched by age, sex, and race (all Limitations: The study's small sample size and cross-sectional design limit statistical power and causal inference. Conclusions: Metrics of basic physical function demonstrate limited association with VO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.