Wet markets, live animals, and infection concerns in Thailand: A cross-sectional study.

Robin Goodwin, Katy Stokes, Rewadee Watakakosol, Panrapee Suttiwan, Arunya Tuicomepee, Juthatip Wiwattanapantuwong

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robin GoodwinDepartment of Psychology, University of Warwick, UK.

Katy StokesDepartment of Psychology, University of Warwick, UK.

Rewadee WatakakosolFaculty of Psychology, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

Panrapee SuttiwanFaculty of Psychology, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

Arunya TuicomepeeFaculty of Psychology, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

Juthatip WiwattanapantuwongFaculty of Psychology, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to examine patterns of wet market attendance, live animal purchasing, and social contact behaviours in Thailand, and to assess perceived infection risks in these settings. A total of 1050 Thai residents across multiple regions of Thailand, aged 16-69 years (50.8% female) were recruited through street-intercept sampling. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 16 and residence in Thailand; exclusion criteria included inability to complete the interview. Our results found, 42% of respondents reported attending wet markets at least several times per month. Attendance was higher amongst women, those with lower education, and smaller households. Frequent market attendees reported more physical contact (

Indexed as

Animal marketAnxietyInfectious diseaseSocial contactZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID41675173

DOI10.1016/j.onehlt.2026.101346

PMCPMC12887723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.