ReviewiMetaOmics2025
Skin microbiome engineering: Challenges and opportunities in skin diseases treatment.
Review in iMetaOmics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Emerging Microbiome-Based Therapies for Skin Infections: From Probiotics and Prebiotics to Synthetic Microbiome Engineering.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- The silent microbial shift: climate change amplifies pathogen evolution, microbiome dysbiosis, and antimicrobial resistance.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2025Review
- The skin microbiome: from historical ecology to therapeutic frontiers.Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The skin microbiome, consisting of a vast array of microorganisms, is essential for human skin health, aiding in barrier protection, immune regulation, wound repair, and defense against pathogens. Disruptions in this microbial balance are closely linked to the onset and worsening of various skin disorders. This review evaluates the potential of skin microbiome engineering as a therapeutic strategy for treating skin diseases. We discuss nontargeted approaches like probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation that aim to reshape the microbial community, as well as targeted methods such as phage therapy, phage lysins, and engineered bacteria, which specifically modulate microbial populations or influence the skin environment. These approaches open new avenues for personalized dermatological treatments. Despite significant progress, challenges remain in the clinical translation of microbiome-based therapies. Safety, standardization, regulatory approval, and long-term ecological stability must be addressed to ensure efficacy and reproducibility in clinical settings, underscoring the critical need for further research in their dermatological applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.