ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
An integrated CSF-serum biomarker model for predicting clinical progression in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The early and accurate identification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains a significant clinical challenge. Integrating novel peripheral blood-based biomarkers with established cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measures may offer a promising strategy to enhance diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification. Methods: This study enrolled 91 participants who underwent CSF and serum testing. The cohort was randomly divided into a training set ( Results: The final predictive model incorporated CSF pTau181, A/G ratio, and PLR (using a cut-off ≥113.22). It demonstrated robust discrimination, achieving an AUC of 0.92 in the training set, 0.86 in the testing set, and 0.83 upon external validation. Calibration was excellent (MAE = 0.039). In the testing set, sensitivity was 0.83 and specificity was 0.86. A higher A/G ratio was associated with a reduced risk of AD progression, whereas a higher PLR was associated with an increased risk. Conclusion: The combined CSF-peripheral blood biomarker model demonstrates robust discrimination and calibration for predicting AD progression. By linking central tau pathology with peripheral nutritional and inflammatory status, it may aid clinical risk stratification and guide management strategies focused on nutrition and inflammation. Further large-scale, prospective validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.