ArticleCognitive therapy and research2025
Examining State Affective and Cognitive Outcomes Following Brief Mobile Phone-Based Training Sessions to Reduce Anxious Interpretations.
Article in Cognitive therapy and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A mobile intervention to reduce anxiety among university students, faculty, and staff: Mixed methods study on users' experiences.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Rates of stress and anxiety are alarmingly high in university communities, but most people do not receive treatment. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions show promise to improve psychological symptoms and increase access to interventions, but little is known about their effects in the moment. The present study evaluated the short-term impact of brief mHealth sessions to determine which intervention features are associated with the greatest momentary self-reported improvements. Methods: Participants ( Results: Self-reported improvement in state affect, reappraisal self-efficacy, and emotion regulation self-efficacy occurred for six out of eight stressor domains. Additionally, training sessions requiring less (vs. more) writing were associated with greater positive changes in affect, but not reappraisal or emotion regulation self-efficacy. Conclusion: Stressor domain and writing requirements are associated with different in-the-moment cognitive and affective outcomes, pointing to the need to tailor mHealth programs to users' specific needs and current stressors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.