Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41674948›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2026

Development and validation of a clinical-radiomics nomogram for the differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic solid lesions: a retrospective cohort study.

Qinmei Wang, Yiyang Wang, Jing Wang, Xiangde Min, Qinghai Tan, Bo Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qinmei Wang *Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yiyang Wang *Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Jing Wang *Department of Ultrasound Imaging, Physical Centre, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiangde MinDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qinghai TanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Bo WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3238-266X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate and early differentiation of focal pancreatic solid lesions (FPSLs) in the outpatient setting remains a major clinical challenge. Benign inflammatory conditions, such as focal autoimmune pancreatitis (fAIP) and mass-forming chronic pancreatitis (MFCP), often appear similar to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in clinical features and conventional imaging findings, leading to diagnostic uncertainty and potential unnecessary pancreaticoduodenectomy. Current serum biomarkers lack accuracy, and invasive diagnostic procedures are limited by sampling variability, highlighting the need for a reliable, non-invasive triage tool suitable for outpatient care. Venous phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) best captures pancreatic parenchymal and lesional enhancement patterns, and radiomics from this phase can quantify subtle, visually imperceptible differences in enhancement homogeneity, tissue heterogeneity, and periductal parenchymal remodelling. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and temporally validate an integrated model that combines venous phase CECT radiomic features with key clinical and laboratory variables to better differentiate FPSLs in an outpatient population. Methods: In this retrospective study, outpatients with FPSLs who underwent venous-phase CECT from May 2013 to May 2024 were consecutively enrolled, and diagnoses were based on international consensus criteria (fAIP), or cytology/surgery (MFCP and PDAC). The cohort was randomly divided into training and internal validation sets at a 7:3 ratio. Additionally, 11 fAIP patients and 19 PDAC patients were included in the independent temporal validation analysis. Clinical variables, including demographics, symptoms and laboratory parameters, were collected concurrently with imaging. Quantitative radiomics features were extracted from manually segmented lesions on CECT images. Model discrimination was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The mean age of the three groups of FPSLs patients was 57.21±10.76 (fAIP), 48.25±12.14 (MFCP), and 60.55±9.66 (PDAC) years, respectively. The majority of patients were male, and the pancreatic head was the most common lesion location across all groups (P<0.01). For differentiating fAIP from PDAC, the combined clinical-radiomics nomogram demonstrated strong diagnostic performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95, 0.91 and 0.88 in the training, internal validation, and temporal validation cohorts, respectively. Similar results were seen in distinguishing MFCP from PDAC. However, although the radiomics model showed initial promise in differentiating fAIP from MFCP in the training set, its performance declined in the validation set. Conclusions: Integrating CECT-based radiomic features with clinical data results in a compelling, non-invasive tool for characterizing FPSLs. Future investigations should prioritize the integration of multi-modal data streams to enhance diagnostic precision.

Indexed as

Focal autoimmune pancreatitis (fAIP)focal pancreatic solid lesions (FPSLs)mass-forming chronic pancreatitis (MFCP)pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)radiomics

Identifiers

PMID41674948
PMCPMC12885811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.