ReviewJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2026
Challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of genetic cholestasis in adults.
Review in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic testing in liver diseases: Clinical applications.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Review
- Use of Next-Generation Sequencing and Whole-Exome Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Adult-Onset Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis: Challenges in Interpreting Variants of Uncertain Significance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Parvovirus B19 infection as a trigger of acute cholestasis in heterozygous genetic BSEP deficiency: a case report and review of the literature of acute parvovirus B19-related hepatitis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disorders of bile formation and bile flow along the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts are summarised under the term cholestasis. Clinically, conditions resulting in retention of biliary constituents such as bile acids within hepatocytes (termed primary cholestasis) need to be distinguished from diseases characterised by bile duct injury (termed cholangiopathies). Some cholangiopathies may also cause retention of biliary constituents within hepatocytes, resulting in secondary cholestasis. Genetic variants in a multitude of genes can contribute to the development of both primary cholestasis and cholangiopathies. Assessing the contribution of identified genetic variants to the clinical presentation in adults is complicated by factors such as environmental exposure, comorbidities, and medication intake. The diagnostic workup in adults with cholestasis should first consider common causes of primary cholestasis and cholangiopathies. If the aetiology remains unclear, liver histology and/or genetic testing should be pursued. Until recently, treatment for these conditions was largely supportive. However pharmacological interruption of the enterohepatic circulation of bile acids now offers the possibility of more specific intervention. Moreover, for those conditions in which the bile duct epithelium is the main site of injury, ursodeoxycholic acid remains essential. Multidisciplinary case discussions can help facilitate diagnosis and guide management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.