ArticleQuantitative biology (Beijing, China)2024
Single-cell gene regulatory network analysis for mixed cell populations.
Article in Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering Cell-Type-Specific Transcriptional Regulation in Tomato Leaves Through Ensemble Machine Learning and Single-Cell Transcriptomics.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- GRLGRN: graph representation-based learning to infer gene regulatory networks from single-cell RNA-seq data.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Single-cell gene regulatory network analysis for mixed cell populations.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene regulatory network (GRN) refers to the complex network formed by regulatory interactions between genes in living cells. In this paper, we consider inferring GRNs in single cells based on single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. In scRNA-seq, single cells are often profiled from mixed populations, and their cell identities are unknown. A common practice for single-cell GRN analysis is to first cluster the cells and infer GRNs for every cluster separately. However, this two-step procedure ignores uncertainty in the clustering step and thus could lead to inaccurate estimation of the networks. Here, we consider the mixture Poisson log-normal model (MPLN) for network inference of count data from mixed populations. The precision matrices of the MPLN are the GRNs of different cell types. To avoid the intractable optimization of the MPLN's log-likelihood, we develop an algorithm called variational mixture Poisson log-normal (VMPLN) to jointly estimate the GRNs of different cell types based on the variational inference method. We compare VMPLN with state-of-the-art single-cell regulatory network inference methods. Comprehensive simulation shows that VMPLN achieves better performance, especially in scenarios where different cell types have a high mixing degree. Benchmarking on real scRNA-seq data also demonstrates that VMPLN can provide more accurate network estimation in most cases. Finally, we apply VMPLN to a large scRNA-seq dataset from patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and find that VMPLN identifies critical differences in regulatory networks in immune cells between patients with moderate and severe symptoms. The source codes are available on the GitHub website (github.com/XiDsLab/SCVMPLN).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.