ArticleResearch square2026
Are We Missing the Environmental Factors in AI-Based Fall Risk Models?: A Systematic Review.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Falls commonly occur in home environments where environmental conditions can contribute to fall risk. Identification and mitigation of environmental hazards are critical components of fall prevention. However, artificial intelligence (AI)-based fall prediction models have largely focused on individual-level predictors, with limited attention to home environmental hazards despite their modifiable role in fall risk. Objective: To systematically review how environmental factors are incorporated into existing AI-based fall risk prediction models and summarize reported AI approaches and model performance among community-dwelling older adults. Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Six electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched from inception through December 2025. Eligible studies applied AI-based models to predict falls among older adults in community settings and incorporated environmental factors as model inputs. Results: Of more than 10,000 records identified, nine studies met final inclusion criteria. Six used supervised machine learning with structured data, while three employed computer vision or robotics-based approaches. Environmental factors were heterogeneously represented, ranging from checklist-based indicators to sensor- and vision-derived measures. When included, environmental features contributed meaningful information by improving discrimination or identifying actionable home hazards (AUC-ROC ranged from 0.67 to 0.76). Conclusion: Environmental factors remain underemphasized in AI-based fall prediction models. Greater integration of standardized and context-aware environmental information may enhance the relevance and preventive utility of AI-based fall risk prediction in community settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.