ArticleAJOG global reports2026
Relation between epidural analgesia and perinatal outcomes on Robson class 2a.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction model for intrapartum labor analgesia efficacy based on preoperative multidimensional indicators.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
objectiveSTUDY
designA retrospective cohort study was conducted on every Robson class 2a individual who delivered from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023, at the University Hospital of Modena in the north of Italy. The primary outcome was the delivery mode (cesarean delivery, vaginal delivery, and operative vaginal delivery rates), and the secondary outcomes were the effect of epidural analgesia on the duration of labor, duration of the second stage of labor, Apgar score, and neonatal intensive care unit admission.
resultsOverall, 809 individuals were included in the final analysis, and 456 of them (56.4%) received epidural analgesia on request. Among individuals with and those without epidural analgesia, the cesarean delivery rate was 25% and 20.4% (
conclusionEpidural analgesia was among the factors that increased both the induction and second stage of delivery times. However, epidural analgesia did not impact the mode of delivery and perinatal outcomes in Robson class 2a individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.