ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Telitacicept demonstrates high probability of efficacy in myasthenia gravis: a Bayesian real-world study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This real-world study evaluated the efficacy and safety of telitacicept, a dual BAFF/APRIL inhibitor, in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). Methods: In this retrospective study, 17 myasthenia gravis patients on stable background therapy received weekly subcutaneous telitacicept (160-240 mg). Efficacy was evaluated at 12/24 weeks using a primary composite endpoint (≥2-point MG-ADL and ≥3-point QMG reduction). A pre-specified Bayesian analysis, updating a conservative prior with observed data, was employed to determine the posterior probability of treatment success and its 95% credible interval. Safety and steroid-sparing effects were also assessed. Results: Of the 15 patients evaluable for efficacy (≥12 weeks treatment), 12 (80.0%) met the composite efficacy endpoint. Significant improvements were observed: mean MG-ADL decreased from 8.0 ± 4.4 to 4.2 ± 3.1 ( Conclusion: This real-world study utilizing Bayesian analysis provides evidence supporting a high probability of efficacy for telitacicept in AChR-Ab-positive MG, demonstrating significant symptom improvement, substantial steroid-sparing effects, and favorable safety. These findings complement prior randomized controlled trial data and support the use of telitacicept in clinical practice. Study limitations include retrospective design and small sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.