Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41674766›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Negative Capability-Related Dimensions Among Local Government Public Health Nurses in Japan and Their Associated Factors.

Masana Ujihara, Toru Onashi, Akane Suzuki, Masumi Watanabe, Koichi Ide, Tomoya Kawase, Teppei Masuya, Taeko Watanabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Masana UjiharaFaculty of Nursing and Nutrition, Shukutoku University, Chiba, JPN.
Toru OnashiFaculty of Nursing, Iwate Prefectural University, Iwate, JPN.
Akane SuzukiFaculty of Nursing and Nutrition, Shukutoku University, Chiba, JPN.
Masumi WatanabeFaculty of Nursing and Nutrition, Shukutoku University, Chiba, JPN.
Koichi IdeHealth Division, Miyako Public Health Center, Iwate, JPN.
Tomoya KawaseFaculty of Nursing and Nutrition, Shukutoku University, Chiba, JPN.
Teppei MasuyaGraduate School of Nursing, Shukutoku University, Chiba, JPN.
Taeko WatanabeFaculty of Nursing and Nutrition, Shukutoku University, Chiba, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Local government public health nurses (PHNs) in Japan deliver community-based public health services and often make practice decisions under uncertainty, incomplete information, and competing priorities. This study examined negative capability (NC)-related dimensions among PHNs in Japan - operationalized as ambiguity intolerance (MAT) and attitudes toward ambiguity - and explored factors associated with these dimensions. Methods We conducted an anonymous web-based survey of local government PHNs in Japan from July 16 to August 25, 2024. Ambiguity intolerance (indexed by higher MAT scores) was assessed using the Japanese 24-item Measure of Ambiguity Tolerance (MAT), and attitudes toward ambiguity were measured using a 26-item scale with five subscales (enjoyment, anxiety, reception, control, exclusion). Self-rated understanding of NC was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100), resilience was measured using the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS14), and career development was measured using a 26-item career development scale for local government PHNs. Multiple linear regression (forced entry) was conducted for MAT and each attitude subscale, including sex, municipality type, years of PHN, RN, and other work experience, resilience, NC understanding, and career development subscales as explanatory variables. The primary outcome was ambiguity intolerance (MAT total score). The five attitude subscales (enjoyment, anxiety, reception, control, and exclusion) were treated as secondary exploratory outcomes. Results Data from 380 PHNs were analyzed (94.7% female; mean age 41.2 years, SD 11.9). The model for ambiguity enjoyment was significant (F(12,367)=9.03, p<0.001; adjusted R²=0.203) and showed positive associations with resilience (β=0.257, t=4.00, p<0.001), organizational mission/interpersonal support (β=0.168, t=2.27, p=0.024), professional identity as a PHN (β=0.147, t=2.29, p=0.023), and years of other work experience (β=0.103, t=2.20, p=0.029); years of PHN experience was not significantly associated (β=-0.122, t=-1.94, p=0.053). The model for ambiguity anxiety was significant (F(12,367)=9.82, p<0.001; adjusted R²=0.218) and showed negative associations with resilience (β=-0.357, t=-5.61, p<0.001), policy/organizational management competence (β=-0.270, t=-3.40, p<0.001), and years of PHN experience (β=-0.174, t=-2.79, p=0.006). Other attitude subscales (reception, control, and exclusion) also showed significant associations with several predictors, although effect sizes were modest. Of 532 submitted responses, 152 were excluded due to incomplete key variables. Adjusted R² ranged from 0.076 to 0.218 across outcomes, indicating modest explanatory power. Conclusion NC-related dimensions among local government PHNs were associated with both individual resources (resilience) and career development. Because the design was cross-sectional and outcomes captured NC-adjacent dimensions rather than NC itself, causal interpretation should be avoided; longitudinal, intervention, and qualitative studies are warranted. Because multiple outcomes and subscales were examined, there is an increased risk of chance findings; results should be interpreted cautiously and as hypothesis-generating.

Indexed as

ambiguity toleranceattitudes toward ambiguitycareer developmentjapannegative capabilitypublic health nursesresilience

Identifiers

PMID41674766
PMCPMC12889967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.