Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41674760›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

An Electromyographic Study Comparing Muscle Function During Supination and Pronation of the Forearm.

Suresh Kondi, Thivagar Murugesan, Neil Postans, Paavana Thumri, Ketan Kantamaneni, Shahbaz Ansari, Simon Pickard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Suresh KondiTrauma and Orthopedics, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Trust, Salford, GBR.
Thivagar MurugesanTrauma and Orthopedics, Shrewsbury and Telford NHS Foundation Trust, Shrewsbury, GBR.
Neil PostansTrauma and Orthopedics, The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, GBR.
Paavana ThumriTrauma and Orthopedics, The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, GBR.
Ketan KantamaneniTrauma and Orthopedics, East Kent University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Ashford, GBR.
Shahbaz AnsariGeneral Internal Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, GBR.
Simon PickardTrauma and Orthopedics, The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundForearm pronation and supination are fundamental movements essential for daily activities and clinical applications. While supinator and biceps brachii contribute to supination, and pronator quadratus and pronator teres facilitate pronation, the precise activation patterns and torque-dependent recruitment strategies of these muscles remain incompletely understood. Conflicting evidence exists regarding muscle contribution at varying load conditions, with implications for rehabilitation protocols, surgical planning, and prosthetic design. PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantify and compare the electromyographic (EMG) activity of forearm rotator muscles during isometric contraction under progressively increasing torque loads during both supination and pronation movements.

methodsFour healthy right-handed subjects (3 males, 1 female; mean age 32.5 years) underwent simultaneous EMG and motion capture recording. Surface electrodes captured activity from biceps brachii, triceps, pronator teres, and pronator quadratus, while fine-wire electrodes measured supinator muscle activity. Participants maintained a neutral forearm position against applied loads of 1 kilogram positioned at increasing distances (10-35 cm) from the supination axis, creating progressively higher torques. EMG signals were filtered, rectified, normalized, and analyzed using root mean square values across three trials per loading condition.

resultsDuring supination resistance, the supinator demonstrated higher activation at lower torques compared to the biceps brachii. As applied torque increased, the biceps brachii activity increased proportionally more than the supinator, indicating load-dependent recruitment. Triceps showed increased co-activation for joint stability. During pronation resistance, the pronator quadratus exhibited greater activity at lower torques relative to the pronator teres. With increasing torque, the pronator teres demonstrated relatively greater activation increases than the pronator quadratus. Both movement patterns demonstrated progressive recruitment of multi-joint muscles as torque demands increased.

conclusionsThis pilot EMG study (n=4) provides preliminary descriptive evidence suggesting that supinator and pronator quadratus primarily govern low-torque forearm rotation, while biceps brachii and pronator teres become increasingly dominant during high-torque demands. These observed patterns are consistent with a hierarchical muscle recruitment strategy optimized for mechanical efficiency and joint stability. Understanding these activation patterns may have potential clinical applications for rehabilitation protocol design following nerve injury or tendon rupture, surgical planning for nerve transfer procedures, and development of myoelectric prosthetic control algorithms.

Indexed as

electromyography (emg)forearm rotationmuscle activation patternpronationsport biomechanicssupination

Identifiers

PMID41674760
PMCPMC12885837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.