Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41674745›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Detection of Gelatinous Candy on Gastric Ultrasound During Preoperative Nil per Os Evaluation.

Sathappan Karuppiah, Ratan Banik, Sudarshan Setty

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sathappan KaruppiahAnesthesiology, United Health Services, Binghamton, USA.
Ratan BanikAnesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Sudarshan SettyAnesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perioperative pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents can lead to serious complications, including pneumonitis and pneumonia, which may result in significant morbidity and mortality. A 52-year-old man with a history of hypertension and diabetes presented to the hospital for emergent debridement of bilateral lower-extremity non-healing ulcers.He mentioned consuming gummy bears two hours prior to presentation, although his last substantial solid meal had occurred 14 hours earlier.Preoperatively, a gastric ultrasound revealed the presence of gummy bears within the stomach, prompting the anesthesia team to implement preventive measures to minimize aspiration risk. We also conducted a survey to evaluate anesthesiologists' perceptions regarding the timing of patients' consumption of gummy bears before elective procedures. The survey results indicated a lack of consensus regarding the necessity of preoperative gastric ultrasound and the duration of nothing-by-mouth (NPO) status before elective procedures. Variability in skill levels and opinions among anesthesiologists regarding the optimal waiting period before surgery underscores the need for further research and standardization in these domains, highlighting the potentially critical role of gastric ultrasound in perioperative settings.

Indexed as

gastric ultrasoundgummy bearspulmonary aspirationrapid sequence inductionsurvey

Identifiers

PMID41674745
PMCPMC12888066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.