ArticleQuantitative biology (Beijing, China)2025
Multi-omic data integration and exploiting metabolic models using systems biology approach increase precision in subtyping and early diagnosis of cancer.
Article in Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-omic data integration and exploiting metabolic models using systems biology approach increase precision in subtyping and early diagnosis of cancer.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer is a complex and heterogeneous disease characterized by various genetic and epigenetic alterations. Early diagnosis, accurate subtyping, and staging are essential for effective, personalized treatment and improved survival rates. Traditional diagnostic methods, such as biopsies, are invasive and carry operational risks that hinder repeated use, underscoring the need for noninvasive and personalized alternatives. In response, this study integrates transcriptomic data into human genome-scale metabolic models (GSMMs) to derive patient-specific flux distributions, which are then combined with genomic, proteomic, and fluxomic (JX) data to develop a robust multi-omic classifier for lung cancer subtyping and early diagnosis. The JX classifier is further enhanced by analyzing heterogeneous datasets from RNA sequencing and microarray analyses derived from both tissue samples and cell culture experiments, thereby enabling the identification of key marker features and enriched pathways such as lipid metabolism and energy production. This integrated approach not only demonstrates high performance in distinguishing lung cancer subtypes and early-stage disease but also proves robust when applied to limited pancreatic cancer data. By linking genotype to phenotype, GSMM-driven flux analysis overcomes challenges related to metabolome data scarcity and platform variability by proposing marker processes and reactions for further investigation, ultimately facilitating noninvasive diagnostics and the identification of actionable biomarkers for targeted therapeutic intervention. These findings offer significant promise for streamlining clinical workflows and enabling personalized therapeutic strategies, and they highlight the potential of our versatile workflow for unveiling novel biomarker landscapes in less studied diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.