ArticleQuantitative biology (Beijing, China)2025
A data-driven sliding-window pairwise comparative approach for the estimation of transmission fitness of SARS-CoV-2 variants and construction of the evolution fitness landscape.
Article in Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A data-driven sliding-window pairwise comparative approach for the estimation of transmission fitness of SARS-CoV-2 variants and construction of the evolution fitness landscape.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estimating the transmission fitness of SARS-CoV-2 variants and understanding their evolutionary fitness trends are important for epidemiological forecasting. Existing methods are often constrained by their parametric natures and do not satisfactorily align with the observations during COVID-19. Here, we introduce a sliding-window data-driven pairwise comparison method, the differential population growth rate (DPGR) that uses viral strains as internal controls to mitigate sampling biases. DPGR is applicable in time windows in which the logarithmic ratio of two variant subpopulations is approximately linear. We apply DPGR to genomic surveillance data and focus on variants of concern (VOCs) in multiple countries and regions. We found that the log-linear assumption of DPGR can be reliably found within appropriate time windows in many areas. We show that DPGR estimates of VOCs align well with regional empirical observations in different countries. We show that DPGR estimates agree with another method for estimating pathogenic transmission. Furthermore, DPGR allowed us to construct viral relative fitness landscapes that capture the shifting trends of SARS-CoV-2 evolution, reflecting the relative changes of transmission traits for key genotypic changes represented by major variants. The straightforward log-linear regression approach of DPGR may also facilitate its easy adoption. This study shows that DPGR is a promising new tool in our repertoire for addressing future pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.