Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41674705›Full record

ReviewImmuno-oncology technology2026

Redirecting engineered immune cells using G protein-coupled receptors in cancer therapy.

W den Hartog, J Harwood, S Kobold

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immuno-oncology technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

W den HartogInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
J HarwoodInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
S KoboldInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) cellular therapy, particularly CAR-T cells, has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies. However, these therapies show limited efficacy against solid tumors, in part due to the inefficient trafficking of effector cells to the tumor. This review explores the potential of engineering natural and synthetic G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to overcome this migratory hurdle. Chemokine receptors have been the most used GPCR family in this setting. Engineering effector immune cells to express chemokine receptors that match tumor-derived chemokines has been shown to increase their chemotaxis and to improve antitumor efficacy in preclinical models. In addition to improved migration, chemokine receptor engineering can also have additional benefits, such as remodeling of the tumor microenvironment and metabolic rewiring of engineered cells. However, the effectiveness of this approach is limited by the tumor-specific and heterogeneous chemokine milieu. Emerging strategies make use of synthetic GPCRs and could overcome some of these limitations using chemogenetic and optogenetic approaches. Here, mutated GPCRs binding only to specific and orthogonal ligands or light-sensitive channels are used for cell modulation and trafficking. Equipping cells with these synthetic GPCRs allows for precise and stimulus-controlled immune cell migration. Together, natural and synthetic GPCR engineering form promising approaches to enhance immune cell trafficking, persistence, and efficacy.

Indexed as

adoptive cell therapycell traffickingchemokine receptorsGPCR engineeringsolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID41674705
PMCPMC12887374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.