ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
The role of maturation in upper-limb plyometric vs. technical plyometric training for youth badminton players.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Rigid-Body Pendulum Model for Plyometric Push-Up Biomechanics: Analytical Derivation and Numerical Quantification of Flight Time, Arc Displacement, Maximum Height, and Mechanical Power Output.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Plyometric training may enhance upper-limb explosive performance and stroke velocity in youth badminton players while contributing to mitigate injury risk, yet the influence of biological maturation on these adaptations remains unclear. Purpose: To compare the effects of upper-limb plyometric training (PLYOgen), technical plyometric training integrating badminton stroke mechanics (PLYObad), and regular training on upper-limb strength, plyometric performance, and smash speed while accounting for maturity offset. Methods: Sixty-two male players (12-14 years) were randomized to PLYOgen, PLYObad, or control. All groups continued their usual badminton practice (2-3 sessions/week; 75-90 min/session). Over 6 weeks, only the intervention groups completed an additional supervised plyometric session once per week (25-30 min; 72 explosive actions), whereas the control group performed no additional plyometric/strength sessions. Repeated-measures ANCOVA with maturity offset as covariate assessed pre-post changes in overhead medicine ball throw, seated chest pass, plyometric push-up height, and smash speed. Results: Significant time effects were observed for all outcomes (p < 0.001; η Conclusion: Both plyometric approaches enhanced upper-limb explosive performance, with biological maturation significantly moderating training responsiveness. This should be considered when modifying youth training programs to manage injury risk factors and to ensure that training practices are appropriately aligned with the players' developmental level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.