Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41674566›Full record

ArticleiMetaOmics2025

Multi-omics analysis of gut-organ axes reveals the high-altitude adaptation in Tibetan chicken.

Tao Zeng, Tiantian Gu, Yongqing Cao, Yong Tian, Jianmei Yin, Peishi Feng, Hanxue Sun, Jindong Ren, Xueying Ma, Zelong Zhao and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iMetaOmics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Tao ZengState Key Laboratory for Quality and Safety of Agro-Products Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Poultry) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3349-0291
Tiantian GuState Key Laboratory for Quality and Safety of Agro-Products Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Poultry) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Hangzhou China.
Yongqing CaoState Key Laboratory for Quality and Safety of Agro-Products Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Poultry) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Hangzhou China.
Yong TianState Key Laboratory for Quality and Safety of Agro-Products Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Poultry) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Hangzhou China.
Jianmei YinNational Chickens Genetic Resources, Jiangsu Institute of Poultry Science Yangzhou China.
Peishi FengZhejiang University of Technology Hangzhou China.
Hanxue SunState Key Laboratory for Quality and Safety of Agro-Products Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Poultry) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Hangzhou China.
Jindong RenState Key Laboratory for Quality and Safety of Agro-Products Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Poultry) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Hangzhou China.
Xueying MaInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine Tibet Academy Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences Lhasa China.
Zelong ZhaoShanghai BIOZERON Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Shanghai China.
Guohui LiNational Chickens Genetic Resources, Jiangsu Institute of Poultry Science Yangzhou China.
Li ChenState Key Laboratory for Quality and Safety of Agro-Products Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Poultry) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Hangzhou China.
Wenwu XuState Key Laboratory for Quality and Safety of Agro-Products Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Poultry) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Hangzhou China.
Qian XueNational Chickens Genetic Resources, Jiangsu Institute of Poultry Science Yangzhou China.
Wei HanNational Chickens Genetic Resources, Jiangsu Institute of Poultry Science Yangzhou China.
Lizhi LuState Key Laboratory for Quality and Safety of Agro-Products Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Poultry) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7090-5022

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is an extreme ecosystem subject to special climatic conditions that require unique adaptations for its inhabiting organisms. In addition to genetic characteristics, the gut microbiota of animals can regulate the environmental adaptation of their hosts through various gut-organ axes. We performed a multi-omics analysis on six Chinese chicken populations based on geographical differences in altitude: one high-altitude Tibetan chicken population, one transitional Tibetan chicken population relocated from high to low altitude, and four low-altitude populations. We found significant differences in gut microbiota among these different chicken populations, which were governed by variations in habitat species pools and turnover, indicating a more complex and stochastically dominated gut microbiota with higher functional redundancy in the Tibetan chicken population under the plateau environment. Furthermore, Tibetan chickens had a more effective fatty acid degradation capacity, corresponding to the hypoxic environment. In contrast, chickens living in lowland environments showed stronger immune system responses against health threats. These environmental adaptation strategies are regulated by core gut microbe taxa of the phylum Firmicutes. Thus, our findings demonstrate the roles of breed and habitat in gut microbiota composition of chickens and clarify their adaptation strategies to environmental changes via microbiota-driven gut-organ axes.

Indexed as

environmental adaptationfatty acid metabolismgut microbiotagut‐organ axisimmune activitypoultry

Identifiers

PMID41674566
PMCPMC12806142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.