ArticleInternational journal of microbiology2026
Validation of CRownLab Pneumoplex for the Detection of
Article in International journal of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosing Sepsis and Identifying Bacterial Resistance Genes Directly from Whole Blood Using a Rapid Real-Time PCR System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Validation of CRownLab Pneumoplex for the Detection ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Early diagnosis of bacterial sepsis remains a significant challenge in clinical practice, primarily due to the limitations of conventional methods such as blood culture, which require prolonged turnaround times and have low sensitivity. The real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method using CRownLab Pneumoplex was developed to enable rapid and simultaneous detection of pathogens. This study is aimed at evaluating the diagnostic validity of CRownLab Pneumoplex in detecting Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 400 sepsis patients recruited between October 2024 and February 2025. Blood, sputum, urine, and pus specimens were collected from patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All samples were analyzed using culture methods as the gold standard and RT-PCR using CRownLab Pneumoplex. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Results: RT-PCR detection of Conclusions: The RT-PCR method using CRownLab Pneumoplex demonstrated high diagnostic validity for the detection of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.