ReviewQuantitative biology (Beijing, China)2023
Towards applications of genome-scale metabolic model-based approaches in designing synthetic microbial communities.
Review in Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-scale metabolic models predict diet- and lifestyle-driven shifts of ecological interactions in the gut microbiome.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- Water kefir as a paradigm for multi-omics and genome-scale metabolic modelling in fermented food.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Review
- Review
- Microbial Interactions in Food Fermentation: Interactions, Analysis Strategies, and Quality Enhancement.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Living in mangroves: a syntrophic scenario unveiling a resourceful microbiome.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Genome-scale metabolic models applied for human health and biopharmaceutical engineering.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Synthetic microbial communities, with different strains brought together by balancing their nutrition and promoting their interactions, demonstrate great advantages for exploring complex performance of communities and for further biotechnology applications. The potential of such microbial communities has not been explored, due to our limited knowledge of the extremely complex microbial interactions that are involved in designing and controlling effective and stable communities. Results: Genome-scale metabolic models (GEM) have been demonstrated as an effective tool for predicting and guiding the investigation and design of microbial communities, since they can explicitly and efficiently predict the phenotype of organisms from their genotypic data and can be used to explore the molecular mechanisms of microbe-habitats and microbe-microbe interactions. In this work, we reviewed two main categories of GEM-based approaches and three uses related to design of synthetic microbial communities: predicting multi-species interactions, exploring environmental impacts on microbial phenotypes, and optimizing community-level performance. Conclusions: Although at the infancy stage, GEM-based approaches exhibit an increasing scope of applications in designing synthetic microbial communities. Compared to other methods, especially the use of laboratory cultures, GEM-based approaches can greatly decrease the trial-and-error cost of various procedures for designing synthetic communities and improving their functionality, such as identifying community members, determining media composition, evaluating microbial interaction potential or selecting the best community configuration. Future efforts should be made to overcome the limitations of the approaches, ranging from quality control of GEM reconstructions to community-level modeling algorithms, so that more applications of GEMs in studying phenotypes of microbial communities can be expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.