ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Development and validation of a prediction model for the incidence of psychological disturbance in Chinese nurses: baseline data from a cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthy psychology is a crucial factor in determining nurses' ability to provide high-quality nursing care to patients. Therefore, it is essential to detect the risk of nurses' psychological disturbance and provide early intervention. This study aimed to investigate the psychological status of nurses and develop a nomogram model to predict the incidence of psychological disturbance in Chinese nurses. Methods: This study was part of the Chinese Nurse Cohort Study, and the data of 3,808 nurses were obtained from multiple tertiary hospitals in China. Data related to psychological disturbance were collected using the Symptom Checklist 90. Predictor selection was guided by the Job Demands-Resources model, encompassing 26 variables across three domains: living conditions, working situation and psychosocial indicators. Predictors were selected via stepwise regression, and a logistic regression model was developed to construct a predictive nomogram. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, decision curve analysis, bootstrap approach and 10-fold cross-validation. Results: Independent protective indicators for nurses' psychological disturbance included perceived social support, organizational career management, weekly leisure time, regular meals and published articles, while risk indicators included negative acts, working years, raising children, patients in day shift care and night shift work hours. All these variables were used to establish the nomogram. In the nomogram, the area under the ROC curves was 0.803 (95% Conclusion: This study developed a prediction model to evaluate the risk of psychological disturbance among nurses for the first time. Nursing managers can use this visualized prediction model to predict the risk of nurses' psychological disturbance, identify individualized risk factors, and implement preventive measures to reduce the occurrence of psychological disturbances among nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.