ArticleReproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2026
Comparative Evaluation of Follicular Flushing Frequency and Scraping Time During Ovum Pick-Up in Mares: Effects on Oocyte Recovery Rate and Technical Considerations.
Article in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Follicular Flushing Frequency and Scraping Time During Ovum Pick-Up in Mares: Effects on Oocyte Recovery Rate and Technical Considerations.Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration or ovum pick-up (OPU) has become the standard technique for oocyte collection in mares for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Although repeated follicular flushes and wall scraping are commonly used to improve oocyte recovery rate (ORR), the relative contribution of each remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the effects of multiple flushes versus controlled scraping time on ORR in mares. A controlled trial was conducted in two phases: (1) an ex vivo phase using slaughterhouse ovaries (n = 32), and (2) an in vivo phase in clinically healthy mares (n = 9). Follicles were assigned to two groups: multiple flushes (MF, 10 flushes with intermittent scraping, lasting 18 s in total) or single flush (SF, 18 s of continuous scraping followed by 1 flush). A total of 489 follicles were aspirated ex vivo and 143 in vivo. Results showed no significant difference in ORR between MF and SF groups in either phase (ex vivo: 63.8% vs. 59.5%; in vivo: 48.3% vs. 44.3%; p > 0.05). However, MF used significantly more flushing medium per follicle in the ex vivo model (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in aspiration time or incidence of clots and blockages in the aspiration lines. A significant correlation was observed between clot number and aspiration system blockage (r = 0.497, p = 0.036). Continuous scraping without repeated flushing reduces medium usage but may increase operator fatigue and the risk of clot formation and system obstructions. Therefore, optimising scraping duration could improve the efficiency of oocyte recovery procedures while simplifying the technique and reducing costs. Further research is required to refine scraping protocols, reduce operator fatigue, and prevent complications related to clot formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.