ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Swimming performance, maximum O2 consumption, EPOC, post-exercise recovery and tissue metabolites after fatigue by Ucrit versus chase protocols in mahi-mahi (Coryphaena hippurus), a high-performance pelagic teleost.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carangiform fishes are highly active pelagic teleosts, but there have been relatively few studies of their swimming physiology. Recent evidence in other species suggests that swimming to exhaustion using a critical swimming speed (Ucrit) protocol may yield higher maximum O2 consumption rates (ṀO2,max) than chase methodologies. However, there has been little work comparing the internal physiological disturbances and recovery processes resulting from the two methods. We compared these two protocols in young adult mahi-mahi (∼254 g, 26°C, 32 ppt). ṀO2,max after chasing (20 min) was 30% lower than during Ucrit swimming (20-min speed increments). Absolute and factorial aerobic scopes were 42% and 30% lower, respectively, by chasing. Post-exercise recovery was much slower in chased fish, with a ≥1.8-fold higher excess post-exercise O2 consumption (EPOC) than in Ucrit fish. Sixty percent of the total O2 cost of swimming to fatigue in the Ucrit protocol was incurred during swimming (i.e. extra ṀO2 above resting O2 consumption rate, ṀO2,rest) and 40% during recovery (i.e. EPOC). Tissue-specific profiles of metabolites were very different between the two protocols, with the Ucrit treatment causing greater lactate accumulation in red muscle, and chasing causing greater lactate accumulation in the liver and intracellular pH depression in both the red and white muscle at exhaustion, with other differences during recovery. Overall, the results suggest a much greater anaerobic contribution to exercise metabolism caused by chasing. The two protocols yield vastly different results, reflecting different processes. We conclude that the Ucrit protocol provides a much better profile of aerobic capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.