ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2026
Cardiac Arrest as an Extended Indication for Organ Donation: An Analysis of Potential in Germany Based on Retrospective Data From European Countries.
Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organ donation and brain preservation after assisted dying: case report and considerations for a potential pathway.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Not a Reliable Method for Determining Death.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026Article
- In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026Article
- Potential for donation after circulatory death in Germany: a multicenter retrospective study at seven university hospitals.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study concerns the potential alleviation of the scarcity of donor organs in Germany by an extension of the indication for organ donation to cardiac arrest (donation after circulatory death, DCD).
methodsTrends in the number of organ donations in nine European countries after the introduction of DCD were analyzed and projected onto the documented numbers of organ donations in Germany over the period 2011-2023 by means of regression analyses. The effect on liver and kidney transplantation in Germany was modeled for each scenario with the Eurotransplant simulators ELAS and ETKidney.
resultsCompared to the control scenario without DCD (829 liver transplantations), the largest increases in liver transplantation in 2023 were found with the scenarios for Spain (+384) and Switzerland (+290), followed by those for Belgium (+224), Italy (+155), the United Kingdom (+125), the Netherlands (+112), the Czech Republic (+87), and France (+69). Similarly, the largest increases in kidney transplantation compared to the control scenario without DCD (1361 kidney transplantations) were found in the scenarios for Spain (+1186), Switzerland (+850), the Netherlands (+699), the United Kingdom (+661), Italy (+551), Belgium (+455), the Czech Republic (+432), and France (+128). The Austrian scenario did not yield any increase in either liver or kidney transplantation (-10 and -44, respectively). In most of the scenarios, waiting lists, MELD scores, and the dialysis time at transplantation were reduced in parallel with the rise in the number of transplantations.
conclusionThese scenarios indicate that the introduction of a DCD program could help make more organs available. Its effect would nonetheless depend on accompanying structural measures and societal factors. DCD would probably not solve the problem of organ scarcity if instituted as a single measure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.